Legal Opinion

Drs. Lane, Bryant, Eubanks & Dulaney v. Otts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1982No. 80-518PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Plaintiff, Margaret B. Otts, filed this action in Mobile Circuit Court against Drs. Lane, Bryant, Eubanks and Dulaney, board certified anesthesiologists, seeking damages for the death of William E. Otts resulting from the alleged negligence and wantonness of the physicians. Otts was scheduled for orthopaedic surgery. His surgeon arranged for the defendant group of physicians to provide anesthesia service to him during the course of his surgery. The group employed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Smarr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Parrish v. SpinkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  4. Satterwhite v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Zills v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hall v. HilbunMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bertha Morrison v. Washington County, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Rickey E. Haney v. Mizell Memorial Hospital, a Corporation Dr. John MeigsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. May v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API