Legal Opinion
Nick v. City of Lake Forest
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 2014No. G047115PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, Acting P. J.
Real party in interest and respondent 7-Eleven, Inc. (7-Eleven), applied to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Department) for a license to sell beer and wine at its store located within defendant and respondent City of Lake Forest (City). Based on the number of other businesses that held liquor licenses in the area, the Department would not act on the application without first receiving a determination from the City that “public convenience or necessity would be served by . . . issuance [of the license to 7-Eleven].” (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 23958.4, subd.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Superior Court of Fresno Cnty. v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Fresno Superior Court v. PERBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Humboldt County Adult Protective Services v. Superior Court of Humboldt CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Miller v. Dept. of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022