Legal Opinion

Ruffin v. City of Millen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1916No. 7729PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari; from Jenkins superior court — Judge Henry C. Hammond. July 5, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. When one who has been convicted in a recorder’s or mayor’s court of the violation of. a municipal ordinance seeks to review the judgment against him, he must either make an affidavit in forma pauperis, or give a bond conditioned for his personal appearance to abide the final order, judgment, or sentence upon him. Acts 1902, p. 105; Park’s Ann. Code, § 5191 (a).

2. It is not a compliance with either the act of 1902, supra, or the act of August 13, 1909 (Acts, 1909, p. 148), for a defendant who has been convicted in a municipal court to give a bond conditioned for the appearance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Memmler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Kendricks v. City of MillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Flynn v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Scott v. City of CamillaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Gas Products Co. v. VismorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Andeppa v. Mayor of SavannahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Nightingale v. Mayor of BrunswickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API