Legal Opinion

Flynn v. City of East Point

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1916No. 7810PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton, superior court — Judge Pendleton. May-25, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBkoyi.es, J.

When one who has been convicted in a recorder’s or mayor’s court of the violation of a municipal ordinance seeks to review the judgment against him, he must either make an affidavit in forma pauperis, or give a bond conditioned for his personal appearance to abide the final order, judgment, or sentence in the case. When the affidavit is not made, and such a bond is not given, the certiorari should not be sanctioned, or, if sanctioned, should be dismissed. Scott v. Camilla, 7 Ga. App. 689 (67 S. E. 846); Moon v. Jefferson, 10 Ga. App. 572 (73 S. E. 854). In this case the bond, instead of being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Memmler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Kendricks v. City of MillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Moon v. City of JeffersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Scott v. City of CamillaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. Mayor of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Moody v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Standard Gas Products Co. v. VismorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Boozer v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Ruffin v. City of MillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API