Legal Opinion

Andeppa v. Mayor of Savannah

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 22, 1933No. 23703PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

1. It is not a compliance with, the act of December 10, 1902 (Ga. Laws 1902, p. 105; Park’s Code, § 5191a), or the act of 1909 (Ga. Laws 1909, p. 148; Park’s Code, §§ 5192-94), for a defendant convicted in a municipal court to give a bond conditioned, “should said principal be and appear to answer and abide by the final judgment or decree of the superior court of [the county where such municipality is located] in said case.” The condition of the bond should be to personally appear and abide the final judgment, order, or sentence upon him. Scott v. City of Camilla, 7 Ga. App. 689; Ruffin v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. City of CamillaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Ruffin v. City of MillenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Kelley v. City of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andeppa v. KidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Long v. City of CrawfordvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API