Legal Opinion

Kendricks v. City of Millen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 4, 1915No. 6276PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Certiorari; from Jenkins superior court — Judge H. C, Hammond. November 30, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

No extended discussion of the various points covered by the foregoing headnotes is considered necessary. Some express reference, however, to the act of 1902 (Acts 1902, p. 105) is deemed advisable, in view of the confusion sometimes arising from a hasty assumption that the act of 1909 (Acts 1909, p. 148), embodied in sections 5192, 5193, and 5194 of the Civil Code, has superseded and repealed all the provisions of the act of 1902, The act of 1902, by its terms, requires that one seeking to review the judgment of a municipal court by certiorari shall, as a condition .precedent to the grant of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Laws v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. Mayor of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Flynn v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Moody v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Blount v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Standard Gas Products Co. v. VismorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API