Legal Opinion

Wells-Dickey Co. v. Embody

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1928No. 6,284PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

On motion for a rehearing, counsel for defendant have called our attention to the fact, not mentioned in their original brief, and entirely overlooked by the court, that before any testimony was introduced the defendant objected to the introduction of any testimony on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. For this reason the opinion promulgated March 29, 1928, is withdrawn, and the following opinion substituted therefor:

The plaintiff, Wells-Dickey Company, a Minnesota corporation, has appealed from a judgment entered in favor of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Raymond v. BlancgrassMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Allen v. Bear Creek Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Murphy v. NettMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Atlantic & Pacific Rld. v. ReisnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Daly v. Swift & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Wills v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co. v. CallenderMontana Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API