Legal Opinion
Saladino v. I.I.G.W.U. National Retirement Fund
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 8, 1985No. 528, Docket 84-7719PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiff, Anthony Saladino, appeals from Judge Knapp’s denial of his motion for attorney’s fees. Saladino’s claim for fees arose from an action he brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (1982) (“ERISA”), against the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union National Retirement Fund (“Fund”) and Theodore Bernstein, its director, to obtain a copy of the Fund’s pension plan. After the case was settled by the Fund’s agreement, inter alia, to provide a copy of the plan to Saladino, he sought attorney’s fees pursuant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas Menhorn v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Handee T. Lee v. Robert NesbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Marie L. Nugent v. Jesuit High School of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Morris Weiss v. Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 544 Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Milton Van Fossan v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Union Local No. 710 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vartanian v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Graden v. Conexant Systems Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Richard P. Kuntz v. Nat J. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- McBride v. PLM International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Vogel v. Independence Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.