Legal Opinion
Thomas Menhorn v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1984No. 82-6084PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
FACTS
Thomas Menhorn appeals from a judgment upholding Firestone Tire & Rubber Company’s denial of Menhorn’s application for benefits under Firestone’s employee retirement plan. Menhorn was employed by Firestone at its Akron, Ohio, plant from Oetober 26, 1953, until he resigned on August 11, 1967, to move to California. Although Menhorn alleged otherwise in his complaint, uncontradieted declarations filed in support of Firestone’s motions below establish that Menhorn was informed before his resignation that he would not receive credit for his years of service in Akron…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Nowak v. Ironworkers Local 6 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Nowak v. Ironworkers Local 6 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Roy A. Cefalu v. B.F. Goodrich CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Penny Grosz-Salomon v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, a Provident Company Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.