Legal Opinion

MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 30, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-112PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether appellant Chase Service Corporation (Chase) served a notice of forfeiture upon appellee William Maciborski “at least twenty days prior to the effective date of the forfeiture” pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-743(A). This case requires us, among other things, to determine how a time period is to be computed when the words “at least” are used in a statute. The trial court granted the appellee summary judgment and Chase appeals from it.

PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

William Maciborski, Sr. became the successor in interest to the purchasers…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Treat v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Glad Tidings Church of America v. HinkleyArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Pulaski v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Chijide v. Maniilaq Ass'n of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. TillmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Seider v. Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. State v. LYCHWICKCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API