MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether appellant Chase Service Corporation (Chase) served a notice of forfeiture upon appellee William Maciborski “at least twenty days prior to the effective date of the forfeiture” pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-743(A). This case requires us, among other things, to determine how a time period is to be computed when the words “at least” are used in a statute. The trial court granted the appellee summary judgment and Chase appeals from it.
PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
William Maciborski, Sr. became the successor in interest to the purchasers…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Treat v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Glad Tidings Church of America v. HinkleyArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Pulaski v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Chijide v. Maniilaq Ass'n of KotzebueAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. TillmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Seider v. Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- State v. LYCHWICKCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.