Pulaski v. Perkins
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We have determined upon our own motion that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal and it must therefore be dismissed. Since this decision is a departure from the past practice of this court, it is appropriate that the opinion be published.
The plaintiff and appellant, Georgia Pulaski, commenced this action for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Her original complaint sought relief against Larry Perkins, Julio Tovar, and Goodwill Industries of Central Arizona, a corporation. The record reflects service upon all three of these originally named defendants. Perkins and…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Coy E. Kirtland v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Columbia Gulf Transmission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Stevens v. Mehagian's Home Furnishings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Continental Cas. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.