Seider v. Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Judith A. Seider appeals from the judgment entered in the Administrative Court (Beaudoin, C.J.) dismissing her petition for review of a decision of the Board of Examiners of Psychologists (“Board”) on the basis that the statutory time period for review had expired. Seider contends that the court erred as a matter of law because she never received the statutorily mandated notice of her right to appeal and thus the period within which she could bring an appeal had not begun to run. We agree and vacate the judgment.
[¶ 2] On July 14,1995, following an adjudicatory hearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faucher v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Givertz v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Town of Freeport v. GreenlawSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Savings & Loan Ass'n of Bangor v. TearSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. Darling'sSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Seider v. Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Bell v. WaltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Gustavus Adolphus College v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Judith Andrews v. Town of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.