Legal Opinion

State v. LYCHWICK

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 22, 2009No. 1 CA-CR 08-0517PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOWNIE, Judge.

¶ 1 Keith Francis Lychwick (“defendant”) appeals from his conviction and sentence for aggravated harassment, a class 1 misdemeanor, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-2921.01 (Supp. 2008). 1 We hold that, in determining the validity of an injunction against harassment, the date of service is not included in the “one year” calculation. We thus affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2

¶ 2 In October 2003, defendant was laid off from his job. He became hostile and bellig erent and had to be escorted from his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. International Rectifier Corp. v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. SK Builders, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Lee HindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API