State v. LYCHWICK
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOWNIE, Judge.
¶ 1 Keith Francis Lychwick (“defendant”) appeals from his conviction and sentence for aggravated harassment, a class 1 misdemeanor, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-2921.01 (Supp. 2008). 1 We hold that, in determining the validity of an injunction against harassment, the date of service is not included in the “one year” calculation. We thus affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2
¶ 2 In October 2003, defendant was laid off from his job. He became hostile and bellig erent and had to be escorted from his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- International Rectifier Corp. v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- SK Builders, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Lee HindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010