State v. Faulkner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ZACHARY, Judge.
*412 Charles Drew Faulkner (defendant) appeals from judgments revoking his probation and activating the corresponding sentences that were imposed upon his convictions of criminal offenses in 2013 and 2014. Defendant argues on appeal that the trial court erred by allowing him to represent himself without first determining that his request to proceed pro se was knowing and voluntary. We conclude that the trial court properly conducted the inquiry required under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1242 (2015), and thus did not err by allowing defendant to represent himself at the probation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. HeatwoleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. PriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Pender County v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019