Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 2017No. COA17-271PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*329 Where no procedural mechanism exists under Rule 21 to issue the discretionary writ of certiorari to review the trial court's judgment entered upon defendant's guilty plea, we exercise *158 our discretion to invoke Rule 2 to suspend the rules and address the merits of defendant's appeal. Assuming arguendo the trial court erred in advising defendant that he had a right to appeal the court's denial of his pro se motion to dismiss, we hold defendant has failed to establish prejudicial error.

On 2 January 2015 around 4:30 a.m., Blair Mincey observed defendant Israel John Rogers and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. PriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. BranhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  5. State v. JoinerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API