Legal Opinion
Greene v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1993No. 91-35569PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The Tulalip Tribes seek to intervene in an action between the Samish Tribe and the Department of Interior regarding federal recognition of the Samish. The Tulalip argue that federal acknowledgment of the Samish as an Indian tribe will lead to the dilution of treaty fishing rights. The district court denied intervention, finding that the action did not implicate treaty claims. We agree that the Tulalip have not identified a protect-able interest to warrant intervention. Even if the federal government says that the Samish are an official Indian tribe, whether…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Portland Audubon SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Venegas v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Donnelly v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.