Legal Opinion
Moseley v. United States Appliance Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1946No. 11065PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellee (United States Appliance Corporation) sued appellants (Tomlinson I. Moseley, Ralph M. Keele and Keelmo Company) and Beauty Shop Supply Company Inc., hereafter called Beauty Shop, for infringement of a patent (No. 1,984,585) owned by appellee. Appellee’s prayer was for an injunction and an accounting of profits and damages. Defenses were that the patent was invalid, and that, if valid, it was not infringed. Trial was had, and a decree was entered dismissing the suit. We affirmed the decree as to Beauty Shop and reversed it as to appellants.1 We held that, as to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Denominational Envelope Co. v. Duplex Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co. v. RuthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Southwestern Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Dean Rubber Mfg. Co. v. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- A. Stucki Co. v. SchwamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Ibis Enterprises, Limited v. Spray-Bilt, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1963
- Douglass v. United States Appliance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Seubert v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Bros, Inc. v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.