Douglass v. United States Appliance Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether the estoppel running against an assignor of a patent to assert its invalidity extends to third persons who acquire by purchase other and later patents of the assignor found to infringe the assigned patent. We think in the present state of the law the question must be answered in the negative.
Ralph M. Keele made application for patent for a hair waving device and simultaneously for a valuable consideration assigned the application to appellee. On December 18, 1934, letters patent No. 1,984,585 issued to appellee on the application.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Toledo Boiler Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- United States Appliance Corp. v. Beauty Shop Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shamrock Technologies, Inc. v. Medical Sterilization, Inc., and Robert S. LuniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- National Welding Equipment Co. v. Hammon Precision Equipment Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Brand Plastics Company v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967
- Tom Lockerbie, Inc. v. FruhlingDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.