Legal Opinion
Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co. v. Ruth
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1932No. 647PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Ruth brought this suit against the Stearns-Roger Manufacturing Company for alleged infringement of patent No. 1,277,750 issued on September 3, 1918, for a flotation process and apparatus. From a deeree adjudging claims one and three of the patent in suit valid and infringed, the Stearns-Roger Company has appealed.
The patent in suit relates to a process and machine for separating metalliferous minerals from rock by flotation. In general the process is as follows: The ore is so finely ground that the metalliferous mineral and the rock or gangue, with which it was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Williams Iron Works Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- The Eimco Corporation v. Peterson Filters and Engineering Company and Komline-Sanderson Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Merrill v. Builders Ornamental Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Bewal, Inc., a Corporation of Kansas and Benjamine C. Edwards, Jr. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.