Hunnicutt v. Stone
Supreme Court of Georgia
Actions. Counties. Amendment. Before Enoch Eaw, Esq., judge pro hac vice. Cobb superior court. November term, 1889. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
The plaintiffs in error sued the defendant in error on a claim which they alleged that the county of Cobh was indebted to the county of Eulton. The action was brought in the name of the plaintiffs in error, as commissioners of the county of Eulton, against Stone, as ordinary of the county of Cobb. Upon demurrer the court dismissed the action. The plaintiffs then proposed to amend their declaration by striking out certain poi’tions thereof, which would leave the action as against the county of Cobb. We think, as decided by this court in the case of Arnett v. Commissioners of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arnett v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Bennett v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Glaze v. BogleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Aven v. Steiner Cancer Hospital Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Atlanta Chamber of Commerce v. McRaeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Barwick v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.