Legal Opinion
Clement v. California Department of Corrections
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 9, 2002No. C 00-1860 CWPublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; GRANTING PLAINTIFF PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
WILKEN, District Judge.
Defendant California Department of Corrections (CDC) and the named Defendant employees of the CDC (Individual Defendants) move for summary judgment on Plaintiff Frank Clement’s section 1983 claims for damages and injunctive relief. Plaintiff opposes the motion and moves for preliminary injunctive relief with respect to one of his claims. Defendants oppose Plaintiffs request for a…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Ross v. County of BernalilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Jacklovich v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Clement v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Nelson v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Ellis v. VadlamudiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.