Legal Opinion

Department of Game of Wash. v. Puyallup Tribe

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1973No. 72-481PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

In 1963 the Department of Game and the Department of Fisheries of the State of Washington brought this action against the Puyallup Tribe and some of its members, claiming they were subject to the State’s laws that prohibited net fishing at their usual and accustomed places and seeking to enjoin them from violating the State’s fishing regulations. The Supreme Court of the State held that the tribe had protected fishing rights under the Treaty of Medicine Creek and that a member who was fishing at a usual and accustomed fishing place of the tribe may not be restrained or enjoined from doing so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Antoine v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  5. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API