United States v. Washington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The State’s petition for rehearing is granted and our opinion of December 17, 1984 is withdrawn. The opinion of the panel which first heard the case is vacated. See United States v. Washington, 694 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir.1983). The following constitutes the opinion of the court.
The State of Washington appeals from the district court’s grant of declaratory judgment in the second phase of this pro*1355tracted litigation over Indian Treaty fishing rights in the Pacific Northwest. The trial court granted the declaratory relief sought by the United States on behalf of the treaty Indians. The Tribes named…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Sneed; Concurrence · Ferguson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Los Angeles County Bar Ass'n v. EuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Sierra Club v. PenfoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.