Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Humphreys

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 10, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This appeal involves the construction of a contract for compensation between an attorney and his Client.

Appellant entered into a contract in writing with appellees to bring suit on a life insurance policy in the sum of $5,000, and the clause of the contract providing for the compensation of the attorney is as follows:

“The parties of the second part (appellees) hereby agree to pay the parties of the first part (appellant) as compensation for legal services, in the event they recover of the Kansas City Life Insurance Company for' said policy, the sum of forty per. cent, of recovery, the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Arkansas Insurance v. McManusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Boynton v. TarbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. RummellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Erickson v. FooteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. Unionaid Life Insurance v. Bank of DoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API