Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Rummell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1974No. 74-129PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant challenges the reasonableness of a Si0,000.00 allowance to Willie Rummel for attorney’s fees under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 66-3238 (Repl. 1966). No evidence was presented on the matter. The allowance was made by the trial judge after considerable argument of counsel on the subject. No issue is raised as to the propriety of this procedure. But see, Union Central Life Insurance Co. v. Mendenhall, 183 Ark. 25, 34 S.W. 2d 1078. Cf. Unionaid Life Insurance Co. v. Bank of Dover, 192 Ark. 123, 90 S.W. 2d 982.

The fee allowance must be reasonable. Ark. Stat. Ann. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Old Republic Insurance Company v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Mutual Life Insurance v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MaloneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. ChambersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Terre Haute Gas Corporation v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Padgett v. HastonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Southall v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Burnette v. Perkins & AssociatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Lytle v. LytleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API