Legal Opinion
City of Detroit v. County of Oakland
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1958No. Docket 47, Calendar 47,436PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This case involves the legality of certain deficiency drain assessments made upon properties owned by the city of Detroit, hereinafter termed appellant. The properties were located in the Royal Oak drain district in Oakland county. Appellees are the county of Oakland and city of Huntington Woods, together with named public officials thereof.
The 3 properties involved are the zoological park, acquired in 1923, the adjacent parking lot, acquired in 1929 (both of which were opened to public use in 1928 and 1929, respectively), and the Raekham public golf course, acquired in 1924 and opened to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- City of Big Rapids v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Booth v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Newberry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Huntington Woods v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Twp. of Southfield v. DRAINAGE BOARD FOR TWELVE TOWNS RELIEF DR.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Golf Concepts v. City of Rochester HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sabaugh v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.