Legal Opinion

Booth v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1925No. 24,710PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson., C, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an order for judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant.

The city of Minneapolis, by its board of park commissioners, entered into a contract for tbe purchase of 207 acres of land 1-| miles outside of the city limits to be used for a public golf course. Plaintiff as a taxpayer sought to restrain the consummation Of the project as illegal.

Part of the land is within the boundaries of the village of St. Louis Park. The village was made a party to the action but faffed to appear. If the city has the right to acquire lands for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. Minnetonka VillageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. City of Bradentown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Burns v. EsslingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Capen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. New Castle v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Nelson v. DelongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Headley v. City of NorthfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Grudnosky v. BislowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Golf View Realty Co. v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API