Bielser v. PROFESSIONAL SYSTEMS CORP.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, JR., District Judge.
Our Order (# 16) dated May 25, 2004, is hereby amended to read as follows:
We now consider Defendant Professional Systems Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss or to Change Venue (# 3). Plaintiff Audrey Bielser (“Plaintiff’) filed an opposition (# 8) to the motion (# 3) and Defendant replied (# 9). We also consider Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (# 11). Plaintiff opposed (# 13) this motion as well and Defendant filed a reply (# 14). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (# 11) will be granted.
I. Background
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hansen v. Harrah'sNevada Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buchanan v. Watkins & Letofsky, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Martin v. Papillon Airways, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011