Bagdadi v. Nazar
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Appellant Henri Bagdadi (Bagdadi) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Jose Nazar (Nazar)1 and Linguex2 in his action for copyright infringement. The district court granted Nazar’s motion for summary judgment and sua sponte granted summary judgment for Linguex. The court concluded that Defendants were entitled to an absolute defense as “innocent infringers” pursuant to section 406(a) of the Copyright Act of 1976. We affirm summary judgment as to Defendant Nazar and reverse the sua sponte grant of summary judgment as to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Quinto v. Legal Times of Washington, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
3Cited by341 opinions
- Mary Bradley v. Harcourt, Brace and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Donald Newcombe v. Adolf Coors Company Foote, Cone and Belding and Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Dawson v. Entek InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Shirley A. Yamaguchi v. United States Department of the Air Force, and Sheila E. Widnall, Officially as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
336 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.