Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Watkins & Letofsky, LLP

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 15, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00226Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 AMY BUCHANAN, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:19-cv-00226-GMN-VCF 5 vs. ) 6 ) ORDER WATKINS & LETOFSKY, LLP., ) 7 ) Defendant. ) 8 ) 9 10 Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 10), filed by Defendant 11 Watkins & Letofsky, LLP (“Defendant”). Plaintiff Amy Buchanan (“Plaintiff”) filed a 12 Response, (ECF No. 11), and Defendant filed a Reply, (ECF No. 12).1 For the reasons 13 discussed herein, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 14 I. BACKGROUND 15 This case arises from Plaintiff’s allegations of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API