Legal Opinion
Dawson v. Associated Electric
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 1994No. WD 48974PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FENNER, Presiding Judge.
Catherine Dawson sought workers’ compensation benefits as a result of having contracted scleroderma1 during her employment at Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Associated Electric). Following a hearing, the administrative law judge (ALJ) denied her claim finding that she failed to prove an exposure to hazardous materials causing her scleroderma. The ALJ also found that Dawson failed to prove the medical-causal connection between her employment at Associated Electric and her scleroderma. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) reversed the ALJ…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawson v. Emerson Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Prater v. Thorngate, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Skinner v. Dawson Metal ProductsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Jones v. Jefferson City School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Estes v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Kelley v. Banta & Stude Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cochran v. Industrial Fuels & Resources, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Henley v. Fair Grove R-10 School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Vickers v. Missouri Department of Public SafetyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.