Legal Opinion

Henley v. Fair Grove R-10 School District

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 2008No. 28565PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, Chief Judge.

Deann Henley (“Claimant”) sought workers’ compensation benefits for an alleged mold-induced allergy which she contends was developed while employed as a teacher at Fair Grove R-10 School District (“Employer”). Following a final hearing before the Division of Workers’ Compensation, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied her claim. Upon Claimant’s application for review, the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) found the ALJ’s award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and affirmed the decision. Claimant appealed. We affirm.

Factu…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Fritz v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. ABB POWER T & D CO. v. KempkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Bishop v. Metro Restoration Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Clayton v. Langco Tool & Plastics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jordan v. USF Holland Motor Freight, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Shelby Patterson v. Central Freight Lines, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Lacy v. Federal MogulMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Elmore v. Missouri State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Pile v. Lake Regional Health SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API