Legal Opinion

Gelencser v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1966PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The material facts are not in dispute and the sole question is a legal one of construction of the exclusionary language of the Unemployment Compensation *65Act. In defining employment under the act as it applies to a governmental unit, sec. 108.02 (5) (f) 4, Stats., provides that the term shall not include the employment of any person as a teacher in an educational institution supported wholly or substantially from public funds.1 Nowhere in the act is the word “teacher” defined. But sec. 108.02 (21) provides undefined terms shall be interpreted in accordance with their common and approved usages…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Johnson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Petition of BreidenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Cheese v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. School City of Lafayette v. HighleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In Re Petition for Fond Du Lac Metropolitan Sewerage Dist.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. SteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API