Legal Opinion

Severance v. Heyl & Patterson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1934No. Appeal 175PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The questions for consideration on this appeal arose on the trial of an issue framed for the purpose of determining whether a judgment entered by confession should be opened, and concern the right of the plaintiff to amend his declaration and the right of the plaintiff to take a voluntary nonsuit where a counter claim arising out of the same transaction was set up by the defendant.

In April, 1920, a lease was made by plaintiff, F. W. Severance, Trustee, to defendant, Heyl & Patterson, Inc., of certain premises in the city of Pittsburgh for a term of three years. The lease…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Goldberg v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Rutherford Water Co. v. Harrisburg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Consolidated National Bank v. McManusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Rooney v. MacZkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Severance v. Heyl & Patterson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Wessling v. LatkanichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Calabria v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Arlia v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1950
  5. Baird v. Aluminum Seal Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API