Severance v. Heyl & Patterson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
The questions for consideration on this appeal arose on the trial of an issue framed for the purpose of determining whether a judgment entered by confession should be opened, and concern the right of the plaintiff to amend his declaration and the right of the plaintiff to take a voluntary nonsuit where a counter claim arising out of the same transaction was set up by the defendant.
In April, 1920, a lease was made by plaintiff, F. W. Severance, Trustee, to defendant, Heyl & Patterson, Inc., of certain premises in the city of Pittsburgh for a term of three years. The lease…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Goldberg v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Rutherford Water Co. v. Harrisburg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Consolidated National Bank v. McManusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Rooney v. MacZkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Severance v. Heyl & Patterson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Wessling v. LatkanichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Calabria v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Arlia v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1950
- Baird v. Aluminum Seal Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.