Legal Opinion

Calabria v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1938No. Appeal, 240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

In tliis workmen’s compensation case, appellant, State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, concedes that there is competent evidence to support the findings and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, and the testimony was not made part of the record. The only question involved is one of procedure, and is whether, under the circumstances related hereinafter, the order of the board, dated June 26, 1936, allowing claimant a rehearing, was in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736 ¡art. 4, §426, as amended by the Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RennSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Horn v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Gairt v. Curry Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Manley v. Lycoming Motors Corp., Etc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Fedak v. DzialdowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Downs v. Linton's LunchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. State Workmen's Insurance Fund v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Hurzon v. Christopher Mining Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API