Bank of the United States v. Manheim
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The complaint alleges and the answer admits that July 7, 1926, Tex-O-Ray Corporation executed a note for $35,000 payable to itself four months after date at plaintiff’s predecessor, Central Mercantile Bank; that the note was indorsed by the maker and by defendant and that it was delivered to the bank for value and before maturity. The answer denies the allegation that the note has not been paid and for a separate defense and counterclaim sets up allegations that defendant and the bank in August, 1926, agreed, in consideration of the procurement by defendant of an assignment to the bank by the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Imperator Realty Co. v. . TullNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Thomson v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In Re the Probate of the Will of BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Paul Conte Cadillac, Inc. v. C.A.R.S. Purchasing Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- New York, N.H. & H.R. Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Pearson v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Frederick v. Niagara Machine & Tool WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.