Legal Opinion

Banfield v. Small

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract to purchase real property. It appears from the complaint that plaintiff and his wife, Marie Banfield, occupied and lived on lot 9, block 5, in Howe’s Addition to the city of Portland, as their homestead, continuously until her death on February 2, 1928. On March 26, 1930, the probate department of the circuit court for Multnomah county entered an order whereby this real property was set aside as homestead for the plaintiff, and such order was thereafter affirmed by this court (In re Banfield’s Estate, 137 Or. 167, 137 Or. 256 (296 P. 1066…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Leet v. BarrOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. In re Frizzell's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wycoff v. SnappOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. SchermerhornOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kinney v. UglowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Jenning v. JenningOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Varner v. Portland Trust BankOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In Re Dunlap's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API