Legal Opinion

Varner v. Portland Trust Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

James C. Caine, as administrator of the estate of John Doody, Jr., deceased, and Hazel Yarner, as the only child and sole heir of the decedent, appeal from a decree of the circuit court denying the petition of the appellants for an order setting aside a certain parcel of real property in the estate of Rose Marie Doody, de ceased, as a homestead. The basis for appellants’ claim is their assertion that the late John Doody, Jr., was entitled to it as the surviving spouse of Eose Marie Doody, and upon his death his interest therein accrued to the benefit of Mrs. Varner.

Eose Marie Doody died…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Standard Lbr. Co. v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Moore v. SchermerhornOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Iltz v. KriegerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Leet v. BarrOregon Supreme Court · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Nat. Bank of Portland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  2. Kirkeby v. Covenant HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. In re BellDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  4. Manuma v. Continental InsuranceHigh Court of American Samoa · 1987
  5. Pelisamen v. Land Commission of the Commonwealth GovernmentNorthern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Trial Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API