Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Griffith v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. 26,979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto which questions the authority of the city of Kansas City, Kan., to enact a certain ordinance extending the corporate limits of the city. After issues were joined this court appointed H. W. Arant, Esq., of Lawrence, commissioner to hear the evidence, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and to report to this court. This has been done and the case has been briefed and argued and submitted for decision. Although the commissioner’s findings and conclusions are advisory to this court rather…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Ruland v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. State ex rel. Dawson v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. City of Emporia v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Incorporation of Olsburg v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jordan v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Martin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. Kreamer v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API