Legal Opinion

Ruland v. City of Augusta

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1926No. 26,305PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This case involves the validity of R. S. 12-501, 12-502, in so far as they attempt to confer upon the district court, or judge thereof, the power to hear and pass upon a petition to enlarge .the corporate limits of a city by adding unplatted territory thereto. The statutes in question read as follows;,

“Whenever any city desires to enlarge the limits- thereof from territory adjacent thereto, the governing body of’ such city shall in the name of the city present a petition to the district court of the county in which said city is situated, or…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. In re Incorporation of Village of North MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. City of Galesburg v. HawkinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Glaspell v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  5. City of Hutchinson v. LeimbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. City of St. Joseph v. HankinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITYSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. Latham & YorkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API