Legal Opinion

City of Emporia v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1915No. 19,062PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

*719The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action is one of mandamus to compel the defendant to construct an undergrade street crossing. The cause was referred to a commissioner who was directed to return findings of fact and conclusions of law. His report is appended hereto. •

The ultimate conclusion of fact, that the action of ' the city in ordering the subway was not without support in reason and consequently was a valid exercise of legislative power, is advisory only. The conclusion of law depends entirely upon the character of the ultimate conclusion of fact. The conclusion of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Anderson v. City of WellingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. City of Potwin Place v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Wells v. MarstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  5. Crawford v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. City of Norton v. LowdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  4. Smith v. HosfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Wichita Water Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API