Polk v. Inroads/St. Louis, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Judge.
Plaintiff, Cheryl Polk, brought an action against defendant, INROADS/St. Louis, Inc. (hereinafter INROADS), seeking damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We reverse and remand.
A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is solely a test of the adequacy of the plaintiff’s petition. Our review of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim requires that we consider the pleadings,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bass v. Nooney Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Young v. StensrudeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Viehweg v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barbara Dibartolo Keathley v. Ameritech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Norber v. MarcotteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bogan v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Barbara Keathley v. Ameritech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Carolyn Bogan v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.