Legal Opinion

Polk v. Inroads/St. Louis, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1997No. 71183PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, Cheryl Polk, brought an action against defendant, INROADS/St. Louis, Inc. (hereinafter INROADS), seeking damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We reverse and remand.

A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is solely a test of the adequacy of the plaintiff’s petition. Our review of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim requires that we consider the pleadings,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bass v. Nooney Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Young v. StensrudeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Viehweg v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barbara Dibartolo Keathley v. Ameritech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Norber v. MarcotteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Bogan v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Barbara Keathley v. Ameritech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Carolyn Bogan v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API