Legal Opinion
Bogan v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2007No. 06-3169PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
Carolyn Bogan challenges the adverse grant of summary judgment on her claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against General Motors Corporation (GM). The district court determined Bo-gan failed to present expert testimony necessary to support her claim; in the alternative, the district court determined the emotional distress claim was preempted by federal labor law. Bogan v. Gen. Motors Corp., 437 F.Supp.2d 1040, 1048, 1050 (E.D.Mo.2006). We reverse.
I
GM hired North American Security Solutions (NASS), a private security firm, to investigate alleged drug sales…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bass v. Nooney Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Dean Humphrey v. Sequentia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- David A. Kostelec v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Williams v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Weitz Co. LLC v. MacKenzie House, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Holschen v. International Union of Painters & Allied Trades/Painters District Council 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Weitz Co. LLC v. MacKenzie House, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Dunn v. Dubuque Glass Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.