Viehweg v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition. The petition, alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress, was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.
In reviewing a dismissal, we give the pleadings their broadest intendment. Young v. Stensrude, 664 S.W.2d 263, 264[1] (Mo.App.1984). In his petition plaintiff alleged:
Plaintiff had a history of back problems which he related to defendant when he purchased his membership at defendant’s facility in July 1984. On April 8, 1985, plaintiff experienced a sharp debilitating pain in his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pretsky v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Young v. StensrudeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wilt v. Kansas City Area Transportation AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rooney v. National Super Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sandin v. SandinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- Crow v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Thornburg v. Federal Express Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- St. Anthony's Medical Center v. H.S.H.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hendrix v. Wainwright IndustriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Polk v. Inroads/St. Louis, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.