Legal Opinion

Norber v. Marcotte

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2004No. ED 82672PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKER T. SHAW, Presiding Judge.

Steven and Deborah Marcotte (collectively, “Marcotte”) appeal from the trial court’s entry of a default judgment against them in favor of Douglas Norber (“Nor-ber”) and from the damage awards derived from that judgment. Marcotte raises six points on appeal challenging the trial court’s rulings with respect to the discovery sanctions entered against him and the damage awards arising from Norber’s petition, which Marcotte claims does not state a claim for relief. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part. 1

In October 1993,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Grissum v. ReesmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. Smith v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Kincaid Enterprises, Inc. v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. In Re the Marriage of DickeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Intertel, Inc. v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Bmk Corp. v. Clayton Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. City of Sullivan v. Truckstop Restaurants, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Grewell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. City of Greenwood v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API