Legal Opinion
Martin v. Masco Industries Employees' Benefit Plan
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 27, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-125 EriePublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MENCER, District Judge.
This case arises from the refusal of defendant Masco Industries Employee Benefit Plan to reimburse plaintiffs, James and Edith Martin, for certain medical expenses. A complaint was originally filed in state court but defendant removed the case to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, on the ground that the plan at issue is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., (ERISA). Both parties have now moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The parties agree upon all pertinent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richard H. Heasley, Sr. And Doris G. Heasley v. Belden & Blake CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Sanders v. ScheidelerDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Davidson v. Wal-Mart Associates Health and Welfare PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004
- Schultz Ex Rel. Schill v. Nepco Employees Mutual Benefit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- International Union of Electronic, Electric, Salaried, Machine & Furniture Workers v. Murata Erie North America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.