Hollerbach v. Hollerbach
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
Petitioner contends the trial court erred in considering evidence introduced at the hearing on 3 February 1987 as a basis in its order for denying petitioner additional compensation. We agree.
Where a trial court sitting without a jury makes findings of fact, the sufficiency of those facts to support the judgment may be raised on appeal. Little v. Little, 9 N.C. App. 361, 176 S.E. 2d 521 (1970). The standard by which we review the findings is whether any competent evidence exists in the record to support them. Id.
Here the trial court made findings relating to an entirely different…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by17 opinions
- Taylor v. Taylor Products Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Terry's Floor Fashions, Inc. v. Crown General Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Gregory v. Atrium Door and Window Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Statesville Stained Glass, Inc. v. TE Lane Construction & Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Department of Transportation v. Elm Land Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.