Legal Opinion

Washington National Investment Co. v. Grandview Irrigation District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1933No. 24865. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Geraghty, J.—

Chapter 43 of the 1933 Session Laws, p. 248, amends several sections of Rem. Comp. Stat., relating to the organization and government of irrigation districts. Section 7445 is amended in some of its details, and by the addition of new matter as follows :

“Notwithstanding anything in this act contained, the board of directors shall .have authority, until March 1, 1935, to grant options to purchase or sell on deferred payment contracts or for cash, land acquired by deed on district assessment foreclosure, in such manner, at such price and upon such terms as they shall deem to be for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petitt v. Riverside Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matthews v. Wenatchee Heights Water Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Outlook Irrigation District v. FelsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Town of Twisp v. Methow Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Rich v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API