Legal Opinion

Petitt v. Riverside Irrigation District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1926No. 19905. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— On June 7, 1919, the respondent took a mortgage upon agricultural land in Okanogan county, and foreclosed the same on July 17,1924. He purchased the land at the sheriff’s sale on August 17 of the same year. On July 10, 1922, there was created within the boundaries of Okanogan county an irrigation district, and in that district was included the land upon which the respondent had the mortgage and which he later secured under sheriff’s deed. For the year 1922, irrigation assessments were levied upon what we shall call the respondent’s land, and these assessments not being paid, the appellant…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Washington National Investment Co. v. Grandview Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wilson Aerospace LLC v. The Boeing Company IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API