Legal Opinion

Outlook Irrigation District v. Fels

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1934No. 24864. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

— This appeal brings in question the constitutionality of chapter 194, Laws of 1933, p. 928 (Rem. 1933 Sup., § 4346-1 et*seq.). Before undertaking to state how the question is raised, it will be well to briefly summarize the act, section by section.

Section 1 (Rem. 1933 Sup., § 4346-1) authorizes an irrigation district which holds a county treasurer’s irrigation assessment deed to bring an action to quiet title in cases where “for any reason a defect in title exists or adverse claims against the same have not been legally determined.”

Section 2 (Rem. 1933 Sup., § 4346-2) defines the action as…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Ballard v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Leigh v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Gautier v. . DitmarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matthews v. Wenatchee Heights Water Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. P. Lorillard Co. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Wenatchee Reclamation District v. MustellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. Horse Heaven Irrigation District v. JenkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API